Government "in denial" on Public Sector Pensions

Tuesday, 30 August 2011 23:17 Chris Blyth
User Rating: / 4

The Burden of Public Sector Pensions – And A Government in Denial....

The Government Strategic Plan states that it is committed to a “fair society”.... but it is in a state of denial as regards public sector pensions and the liability they represent for future generations, let alone the highly unfair situation facing the 70% of the private sector who have no provision for a pension, other than the state Retirement Pension.

The UK Government has had a report into Pensions prepared by a committee of experts under Lord Hutton – it concluded that public sector pensions were “unaffordable, unsustainable and an unfair burden on future generations”. Whilst anxious not to be seen as a “dumbing down “ exercise, and preserving any existing entitlements to final salary pensions, it concluded that major reform was essential. That reform included a significant increase in employee contributions, and the ending of final salary schemes, which are to be replaced with “career averaging” schemes – but at the end of the day, will ensure a fair pension for those in the public sector, without being too unfair to those in the private sector who – if lucky enough to have a pension (only 30% do !) – will very probably be a “money purchase”pension, and unlikely to be anywhere near as generous.

By contrast, the Manx Government is intent on continuing its final salary schemes, now enshrined from the Hymans Robertson Report (NOT an independent report, but a “put up job”, carefully briefed to protect the self-interest of the beneficiaries) – as a result of which, the manx public sector pension liability goes from a current ÂŁ2 Billion+ to some ÂŁ3.6 Billion in 20 years time. The Treasury Minister is on record as saying this is sustainable – but it sounded as if she was repeating the instructions from her civil servants. In Mandy Rice-Davies’s immortal words, “they would say that, wouldn’t they!”

The reality – the public sector final salary pension can be compared to a ponzi scheme, which if practised by the private sector would be embezzlement and subject to legal action, but done by government, is merely politics. It depends on more and more money being put in at the back end (some time in the indefinite future) to support those receiving pension income at the front end (today or in the near future)– an increasing debt which is being run up at the expense of young people and which, if they realised the extent of it, would be horrified. That ÂŁ3.6 Billion represents ÂŁ45,000 for every man, woman and child on the island – and whilst it is true this does not come all at the same time, but drawn out over many years, would still be considered by most fair-minded people as being “an unfair burden on future generations”

It should be a priority for the new government in September to review the whole area of pensions – both public and private sector - and to ensure early action to address the manifestly unfair situation now building up.

The action which should be on the agenda ?

There is an avalanche of “oldies” born in the post-war baby boom, who are imminently about to hit retirement age. Given their loss to the productive economy, and the increased costs they will inevitably incur for government through pensions, social security benefits and their use of the health service, the new government from September will face enormous pressure on budgets. They will not take long to understand that increased taxation and a cut-back in our bloated public sector is essential if the books are to balance, as they are legally  required to do. But ensuring that every retiree has an occupational pension would at least ensure that the need for many of our social security benefits would eventually not be necessary..... and be a key element in the search for a “fairer society”.