Positive Action Group - Possan Jantys Jarrooagh

Open, accountable government, rigorous control of public finances, and a fairer society for all.

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Home Opinion Tynwald
Tynwald

Holding MHKs to account (2)

E-mail Print PDF
User Rating: / 1
PoorBest 

In response to an earlier article on Holding MHKs to account (click to view).

I feel that we should do as suggested and on this website display, well before the next election:

 

Alternative report on the Scope and Structure of Government

E-mail Print PDF
User Rating: / 2
PoorBest 

TIME, TALKS & ALTERNATIVES

The authors of an alternative report on the Scope and Structure of Government are encouraging Council of Ministers to allow meaningful consultation and consideration of other options.
Attachments:
FileFile sizeDownloads
Download this file (Scope_Structure_of_Government_Alternative_Response.pdf)Alternative Report2157 Kb587
Download this file (2010-02-09-Structure_and_Scope_Report_-_members_letter.pdf)Letter to Tynwald Members 9-02-2010132 Kb555
 

Yes Minister!

E-mail Print PDF
User Rating: / 4
PoorBest 

The recent removal and transfer of two of the three political members from the, now clearly disfunctional, Department of Tourism, along with the way these removals were greeted in the printed press, begs a number of questions.

 

The Tynwald Effect

E-mail Print PDF
User Rating: / 2
PoorBest 

Individuals or groups serving the public must balance two priorities: meeting their own needs as providers; and meeting needs of service users.

But this balance may tip. Providers can slide into being driven mainly by their needs rather than those of users. In literature on health and social services this is called the Niskanen Effect (after a leading researcher).

For example, a study carried of a city’s soup kitchen provision found that premises for volunteers to prepare and hand out meals were in middle-class suburbs where the volunteers lived and felt safe. Users bussed in from downtown were looked after, and then bussed back to where they belonged.

And a survey of the administration of a charity set up to assist blind men with retraining and resources to lead an independent life found many users reported providers were in practice less positive about encouraging independence than might have been expected. A major factor was the charity’s need to hang on to funding by holding on to its clients.

In national politics there is a cousin to the Niskanen Effect. For now, let’s call it the Tynwald Effect. Our political providers have needs to be considered before they turn to the needs of users (otherwise known as the electorate.)

Firstly, as opening prayers acknowledge, Tynwald is dedicated (at least in theory) to ensuring that ‘God’s will is done in this land’ (we’re no longer a Christian society, but so what?)

Then, to balance the supernatural, the demands of Mammon must be given due attention with legislation to keep business and financial services sweet.

Also, the political providers, like professionals the world over, have to consider their own dignity, incentives and perks. And in their case there is another and over-riding factor - the necessity of getting re-elected.

So where do we, the users, come into the equation and what should PAG be doing on behalf of the electorate to get the balance right? Over to you …

 

The role of the Chief Secretary in the Isle of Man

E-mail Print PDF

[The following was written by a P A G member. It poses some fundamental questions about the business of government]

Have a look at the Summary of Proceedings of the Council of Ministers March 2009 and check out the minutes for March 2009.

The phrase 'a paper submitted by the Chief Secretary' occurs no less than 13 times for the March minutes alone. The CSO's office is small and I assume they don't have time to write 3 papers a week! As a matter of principle I would like to know:

a. Who instigates these papers in the first place?

b. How many papers submitted by the CSO are rejected by COMIN or are subsequently rejected by Tynwald?

c. Why aren't the CSO's 'papers' in the public domain?

d. Who generates the papers in respect of UK matters?The Ministry of Justice on behalf of other Whitehall departments?

All this seems very opaque to me. I know P A G is concerned about the 'Block Vote' but consider, that the Tynwald members are being asked to vote on legislation that is regularly emerging out of the ether! In the case of the March 2009 minutes the CSO submitted a paper on the Terrorism Finance Bill the minutes stated:

    'given the urgency for introducing the Bill the requirement to consult under the Code of Practice on Consultation be waived.'

Who made the risk assessment of this? The CSO, COMIN or someone in Whitehall?

My overall point is that the CSO presents as being the key political influence in generating actual legislation. I would like to know, for example, when she is going to submit a 'paper' on expediting the Access to Information legislation so that we can read all her other papers!

 


Page 7 of 8

Newsletter

Subscribe

Receive
Our occasional newsletter provides details of forthcoming events and features new website articles.

Main Menu