Positive Action Group - Possan Jantys Jarrooagh

Open, accountable government, rigorous control of public finances, and a fairer society for all.

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Home Opinion Tourism and Transport Protecting our Lifeline

Protecting our Lifeline

E-mail Print PDF
User Rating: / 19
PoorBest 

Who would be best able to protect our ferry lifeline?

Protecting our ferry  lifeline is not the same thing as protecting the interests of the current owners any more than it is about pretending that the user agreement has served us well. Protecting our lifeline is simply about ensuring the Isle of Man has a good quality, value for money reliable service that serves our various needs well. In the heat of the current debate it would be very easy to lose sight of this important principle.

As a result of the arrival of a limited amount of competition in Douglas harbour the current owners have been responsible for the orchestration of some quite extra ordinary outbursts of late.

They first lashed out at some of their biggest customers only later to return with an apology. Then they proclaimed that if their freight customer base was threatened, this would result in passengers having to pay more. Next in line were the staff who have been deeply unsettled by events and,  I believe, have been used in a quite cynical fashion to promote the selfish interests of the owners. Finally we hear vague  rumblings of cuts in services sure to unsettle anyone not already upset by the whole episode.

All this begs the question – so, given the choice, who really would be best able to protect our lifeline if push came to shove?

In the blue corner we have the current owners of our ferry service who are not based on the Isle of Man and have no affinity or loyalty to the Island and no identifiable supporting asset base outside of the ferry company itself. They are not a professional shipping company by occupation but rather, at the outset at least, were bankers and international financiers, who, in their over enthusiasm to get their hands on what they must have seen as a monopoly supplier, massively overpaid for our ferry company using borrowed monies. Like many purchases at the height of the boom this was a rash and foolish act but one they remain determined the people of the Isle of Man will continue to pay for. The debt is so significant, at a figure somewhere well north of two hundred million pounds when last reported, common sense tells you that it cripples the ability of the company to do all the things it needs to do including servicing the interest on the loan, produce a margin above that to furnish the investors with a dividend, commence payment down of the loan capital, reinvest in the business and provide a reserve or margin to respond to any market challenges. Their extremely petulant response to the challenge now presented not only shows that they did not understand the agreement they signed and therefore how a challenge could be mounted but they did not have the ability to face up to the quite modest challenge when it finally appeared.

In the red corner we have the new owners of Mezeron who have deep roots and a commitment to the Isle of Man in the form of Dohle who are themselves part of a successful, very substantial and highly respected international group majoring in shipping and a whole range of shipping services. This group is not subject to market vagaries as they are not a public limited company and display all the indicators of being a very solid and financial sound organisation. They have chosen the Isle of Man as one of their major centres and, by all accounts, have excellent conditions of employment for their Manx based staff.

So on the face of it who do you think would be best suited and able to protect our lifeline if push really did come to shove?

Chris Robertshaw MHK 


(Chris Robertshaw has no association, interest or involvement with Mezeron, Dohle or any associated companies nor a close relationship with anyone who has)

 

Comments   

 
0 #3 RE: Protecting our LifelineGuest 2010-12-01 09:12
Should we developing our harbour facilities to cater for a wider range of passenger and cargo vessels? Eggs are in one basket if the Steam Packet has the only suitable fleet. This angle is not new, has our Government a strategy? Where is the leak to inform PAG members?
Quote
 
 
+1 #2 RE: Protecting our Lifelineroy 2010-11-30 22:02
We'll never know exactly how much we have been taken for a ride, given the off-market transactions that occur between the Steam Packet and other McQuarrie companies.

Bur it will be somewhat in excess of the £150+ each year for every man woman and child on this Island that goes southwards to pay their unsecured debt.
Quote
 
 
+1 #1 RE: Protecting our LifelineGuest 2010-11-30 17:08
Accountancy practices these days seem to be pretty good at hiding the truth, and us public will be kept in the dark as to the cost of running the business. We can only cheer the better provider of a service NOW regardless of the future, only Government are currently in a position to control the future. Public outcry is the only way to let the Government know when they get things wrong. I hope MHKs will inform the public of what is known behind the scenes, but which is generally kept from us. I reckon this requires party politics.
Quote
 

Add comment

Please note that unregistered visitors are required to add their email and 'captcha code' in order to prevent spam and advertising. Your email address will NEVER be published. Registered members do not need to enter this - why not register today?


Security code
Refresh

Newsletter

Subscribe

Receive
Our occasional newsletter provides details of forthcoming events and features new website articles.

Main Menu